Pediatrician Michelle Perro, MD
This is Page 3 of a 3-page article. If you are just joining us, please see Page 1 and Page 2.

Clinical relevance of these studies to human health
The pediatrician and executive director of GMOScience, Michelle Perro, MD commented on the findings of the studies cited above (Mesnage at al, 2016; Mesnage et al, 2017a; Mesnage et al, 2017b):
“Many health practitioners believe that GM and non-GM foods are nutritionally equivalent. The studies by Dr. Antoniou and colleagues call this belief into question.
“In one study, findings from molecular profiling indicated that in the GMO NK603 corn plants there were indications of oxidative stress and elevated levels of certain polyamines (putrescine and cadaverine) (Mesnage et al, 2016). The question is whether this could cause health problems in humans or other animals that consume these plants.
“In living organisms, including plants and animals, polyamines are ubiquitous and are essential for health. Studies have shown when they are depleted in cells, biological functions are significantly impaired; but conversely, elevated levels of certain polyamines can be toxic in some circumstances. While they are tightly regulated by a series of mechanisms in the organism, many of their properties are still unknown. However, in several “omics” studies, changes in their cellular levels have been associated with stress, cancer and aging (Miller-Fleming et al, 2015).
“However, we don’t know if eating plants with altered levels of certain polyamines translates into altered levels of those polyamines in the human or animal consumer, and if so, what that might mean in terms of health. Higher levels of potentially toxic polyamines (putrescine and spermidine) were found in the livers of rats fed this GMO corn. This could suggest an elevated metabolic state, which in turn might indicate injury in the body or other health issues (Mesnage et al, 2017a). Was this a direct result of consuming elevated levels of polyamines in the GMO corn, or some indirect effect? Only further controlled laboratory feeding studies using larger numbers of animals can answer this question.
“The study in which rats were found to have suffered ill health from consuming a very low dose of Roundup at a concentration to which people and animals might be exposed in daily life (Mesnage et al, 2017b) is very concerning. The proteome and metabolome analyses of the livers from these Roundup-exposed female rats indicated that they were suffering from oxidative stress. In particular, the metabolome analysis showed that the glutathione and ascorbate free radical scavenger systems were activated, suggesting that the liver was indeed reacting to oxidative stress. Glutathione is a powerful master antioxidant made in the liver that helps repair cells that are damaged by free radicals, and ascorbates are salts of ascorbic acid, or vitamin C. Free radicals are highly reactive molecules that are believed to play a role in many diseases, including organ damage, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s.
“There were also signs in the study (Mesnage et al, 2017b) that glutathione levels in the Roundup-exposed rats were depleted, albeit not at statistically significant levels, suggesting that the glutathione system was unable to react adequately to the oxidative stress resulting from the toxic insult.
“The fact that the glutathione system was activated and that glutathione levels appeared to be depleted in the Roundup-treated rats (Mesnage et al, 2017b) may well be clinically significant. Consider that autism spectrum disorder (ASD) now affects 1 in 68 children in the US (CDC, 2016). The role of reduced levels of glutathione and the implications for ASD are being actively researched, with many studies published in the past decade examining this relationship and showing low levels of glutathione in people with ASD (Ghanizadeh et al, 2012). If oxidative stress and reduced glutathione levels are found in rats that consume very low doses of Roundup, the question arises as to whether this may also occur in humans. While this is speculative, it shows the need for further study to measure such markers in people.
“The finding in this study that a very low dose of Roundup at a concentration to which people and animals might be exposed caused non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (Mesnage et al, 2017b) is very concerning. Statistics from the American Liver Foundation report that one in four Americans now has non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (American Liver Foundation, 2016), a non-treatable condition in Western medicine that can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis.
“The clinical correlation is clear that Roundup is a potential causative agent in human liver disease and should be removed from agricultural practice until this is further clarified.”
References
American Liver Foundation (2016). NAFLD. https://www.liverfoundation.org/obesity-and-fatty-livers/
Bauer-Panskus A and Then C (2013). (DIS-)GRACE: Risk assessment on the leash of biotech industry. Testbiotech. http://www.testbiotech.org/en/node/785
CDC (2016; reviewed 2017). Data and statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
G-TwYST (2014). Combined study NK603. https://www.g-twyst.eu/the-research/feeding-trials/combined-study-nk603
Ghanizadeh A et al (2012). Glutathione-related factors and oxidative stress in autism, a review. Current Medicinal Chemistry 19:4000-4005.
Mesnage R et al (2016). An integrated multi-omics analysis of the NK603 Roundup-tolerant GM maize reveals metabolism disturbances caused by the transformation process. Scientific Reports 6:37855. http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37855 (open access)
Mesnage R et al (2017a). Transcriptome and metabolome analysis of liver and kidneys of rats chronically fed NK603 Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Environmental Sciences Europe 29:6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28239534
Mesnage R et al (2017b). Multiomics reveal non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats following chronic exposure to an ultra-low dose of Roundup herbicide. Scientific Reports 7:39328. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39328
Miller-Fleming L et al (2015). Remaining mysteries of molecular biology: The role of polyamines in the cell. Journal of Molecular Biology 427(21):3389-3406. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283615003605#!
Millstone E et al (1999). Beyond “substantial equivalence”. Nature 401:525–6.
Séralini G-E et al (2014). Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Environmental Sciences Europe 26(14). http://www.enveurope.com/content/26/1/14/abstract
Testbiotech (2015). GRACE – The EU research project sold out to industry. http://bit.ly/2DJO2Df
Zeljenková D et al (2014). Ninety-day oral toxicity studies on two genetically modified maize MON810 varieties in Wistar Han RCC rats (EU 7th Framework Programme project GRACE). Archives of Toxicology. DOI 10.1007/s00204-014-1374-8

Related Posts

Why Study Toxic Metals in Infant Formula? An Overview of the Results

Why Study Toxic Metals in Infant Formula?
An Overview of the Results
May 2024
Michelle Perro, MD
CEO, GMOScience.org
Article 3 in the Got Real Milk Series
The presence of toxic metals in infant formula is a critical issue that demands immediate action.
Public education is crucial to raise awareness among parents and caregivers about the potential risks and safety measures. Regulatory action by Congress is necessary to empower the FDA and other agencies to enforce stringent safety standards. Additionally, formula companies must take corrective actions to ensure their products are safe.
To address this issue, we are initiating a petition to urge Congress to remove any barriers preventing the FDA from enforcing these necessary regulations. In the meantime, parents can consider various supplements that may help offset the toxicity, although this should be done in consultation with healthcare professionals.
By working together—regulators, companies, and consumers—we can ensure that infant formula products are safe and healthy for our most vulnerable population, our babies.

read more

Toxic Metals in Babies’ Formula Overview

Toxic Metals in Babies’ Formula Overview:
An Introduction to our Research
April 2024
Michelle Perro, MD
CEO, GMOScience.org
Article 2 in the Got Real Milk Series
Given the critical importance of ensuring the safety of baby food, the involvement of citizen scientists in testing for toxic metals cannot be overstated. Baby food, a primary nutritional source for infants, must be free from contaminants that could impair their health and development. Recent investigations have revealed concerning levels of toxic metals like arsenic, lead, cadmium, aluminum, and mercury in various baby food products. These findings underscore the need for vigilant monitoring.

read more

Genetic Engineering and Babies

Genetic Engineering and Babies
ONE-AND-DONE

April 2024

Editorial, CEO, Michelle Perro, MD

Photo Credit Children’s Medical Center www.npcmc.com

Small Interfering RNA (siRNA)

As a children’s specialist, I want to caution parents regarding the emerging use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology, particularly in therapeutic contexts potentially applicable to infants and young children. This technology, which manipulates RNA to silence specific genes, is still in its infancy and carries significant unknowns. Early research indicates that siRNA can unintentionally impact off-target genes, leading to unpredictable biological outcomes.

read more

Parental Alert: GLP-1 for the kids? The AAP says AOK and they are now being prescribed for children as young as 6 y/o. Please read this great article from @ChildrensHD with my commentary included in the article:

This is key...
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "I just want to make this clear. I don't want to take vaccines away from people. I don't want to impose my choices on the American public. If vaccines are working for you, you ought to be able to get them. And I'll make sure that happens. But…

Parental Alert: Thank you, @P_McCulloughMD, for this brief, excellent overview of the negative side effects from Covid vaccination in children with medical problems.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/children-age-5-11-with-medical-problems

Parental Alert: Why should bread last 6 months? Preservatives and chemicals. Solution? Feed your children organic products, preferably made by you.

Load More

V-Symposium Recordings:

GMOScience is offering these 2 days of recordings from April 2023 free of charge, featuring five of the top doctors, scientist, and attorney who are on the front lines, working with people experiencing adverse effects and injury from vaccine exposure and Long Covid. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation of any amount to support our work.

Contact Us

Contact

Related Posts

Why Study Toxic Metals in Infant Formula? An Overview of the Results

Why Study Toxic Metals in Infant Formula? An Overview of the Results

Why Study Toxic Metals in Infant Formula?
An Overview of the Results
May 2024
Michelle Perro, MD
CEO, GMOScience.org
Article 3 in the Got Real Milk Series
The presence of toxic metals in infant formula is a critical issue that demands immediate action.
Public education is crucial to raise awareness among parents and caregivers about the potential risks and safety measures. Regulatory action by Congress is necessary to empower the FDA and other agencies to enforce stringent safety standards. Additionally, formula companies must take corrective actions to ensure their products are safe.
To address this issue, we are initiating a petition to urge Congress to remove any barriers preventing the FDA from enforcing these necessary regulations. In the meantime, parents can consider various supplements that may help offset the toxicity, although this should be done in consultation with healthcare professionals.
By working together—regulators, companies, and consumers—we can ensure that infant formula products are safe and healthy for our most vulnerable population, our babies.

read more
Toxic Metals in Babies’ Formula Overview

Toxic Metals in Babies’ Formula Overview

Toxic Metals in Babies’ Formula Overview:
An Introduction to our Research
April 2024
Michelle Perro, MD
CEO, GMOScience.org
Article 2 in the Got Real Milk Series
Given the critical importance of ensuring the safety of baby food, the involvement of citizen scientists in testing for toxic metals cannot be overstated. Baby food, a primary nutritional source for infants, must be free from contaminants that could impair their health and development. Recent investigations have revealed concerning levels of toxic metals like arsenic, lead, cadmium, aluminum, and mercury in various baby food products. These findings underscore the need for vigilant monitoring.

read more
Genetic Engineering and Babies

Genetic Engineering and Babies

Genetic Engineering and Babies
ONE-AND-DONE

April 2024

Editorial, CEO, Michelle Perro, MD

Photo Credit Children’s Medical Center www.npcmc.com

Small Interfering RNA (siRNA)

As a children’s specialist, I want to caution parents regarding the emerging use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology, particularly in therapeutic contexts potentially applicable to infants and young children. This technology, which manipulates RNA to silence specific genes, is still in its infancy and carries significant unknowns. Early research indicates that siRNA can unintentionally impact off-target genes, leading to unpredictable biological outcomes.

read more