We Can Turn Children’s Health Around

Michelle Perro, MD
Published: September 25, 2018

Children’s health is in crisis. But breakthroughs in our understanding of the importance of gut health can help reverse even serious disease, writes Michelle Perro, MD
At-a-glance

  • 1 in 2 American children has a chronic disease.
  • These disorders include, but not limited to food allergies, endocrine disorders, obesity, autoimmune diseases and neurocognitive disorders.
  • The US – in common with many other nations – is faced with sick children, unhealthy food and a medical system unable to care for them.
  • Disturbances in the epigenetic control of gene function and imbalances in gut bacterial populations (microbiome) are major contributing factors to these illnesses.
  • Lifestyle interventions can help many sick children recover their health.

Recent studies confirm my clinical experience: 43% of children in the United States have a chronic illness, a percentage that rises to 52% when obesity is included as a disease.[1] In other words, a staggering 1 in 2 of American children now has a potentially lifelong disease. For the first time in modern history, children will be less healthy than their parents and will most likely live shorter lives.
Childhood diseases that are on the rise include food allergies, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, neurodevelopment disorders, celiac disease, non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), and obesity. Many of these diseases have multiple causes. For some diseases, there can be a time delay between the exposure and the disease actually showing up. For example, childhood cancers can take many years to develop.
It is clear from the steep rise in the incidence of these conditions (among many others not mentioned) over just a few decades that the causes are not primarily genetic, in terms of inheriting ‘faulty’ genes. It is known that some health problems are rooted in so-called “epigenetic changes”.
Epigenetics means “above genetics”. It is a system that consists of layers of different molecular structures that control the function or expression of the underlying genes encoded in the DNA. Thus epigenetics controls the overall pattern of gene function in a given organ or cell type within the body of an organism.
It is now known that lifestyle and environmental inputs can alter the epigenetic status within the organism, affecting the pattern of gene function for better or worse.
One type of epigenetic modification in particular – DNA methylation – becomes imprinted into DNA. This changes the genetic functioning of the organism that was initially affected. In addition, certain DNA methylation patterns, newly acquired during the lifetime of the parent, can be passed down to their children and even to further generations.
Importantly, epigenetics is a dynamic system. Inappropriate lifestyle habits, including poor diet and exposure to environmental stressors such as chemical pollutants, can result in epigenetic changes, leading to disturbances in gene expression. This in turn can result in ill health. But conversely, positive lifestyle changes can reset the epigenetic and gene function profile, restoring the individual to good health.[2],[3]
Another important system that is now known to be crucial to good health is balance in the bacterial population of the digestive system (the gut microbiome). Imbalance (“dysbiosis”) in the gut microbiome has been shown to contribute to a plethora of ill health conditions, including obesity, type 1 diabetes, autoimmunity (where the immune attacks healthy cells and tissues), mood disorders, nerve degeneration, and heart disease.[4] Fortunately, as with epigenetic status, the gut microbiome is a dynamic system. If it has entered into a state of dysbiosis, for example, through poor diet, it can be brought back to a balanced state, leading to amelioration of a disease condition.
It is fascinating, and perhaps not surprising, that the two systems of epigenetic status of different organs and systems of the body and the gut microbiome have been found to be intimately linked, with molecules produced in the gut influencing gene expression in the body through changes in epigenetic control mechanisms.[5]
This understanding of epigenetics and the importance of maintaining gut microbiome balance provide mechanisms that could explain my clinical experience gained over almost 40 years – which shows that lifestyle changes can result in rapid and significant improvement in many conditions. I’ll return to that topic at the end of this article.
Following is an overview of the major health conditions that are rapidly escalating in our children.
1. Food allergies
Results from a 2009–2010 survey of more than 38,000 children indicate that 5.9 million children, or 8%, have food allergies.[6] That’s 1 in 13 children, or roughly two in every classroom. And food allergies are on the rise. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that between 1997 and 2011, food allergy prevalence among children increased by 50%.[7] Hospitalizations for severe food allergies have increased substantially over the last two decades.[8]
These data only take into account severe food allergies. They do not include the low-grade sensitivities or intolerances to dairy, soy, and legumes, which now affect vast numbers of children. The latter are under-reported due to the fact that they are not commonly evaluated in pediatric practice.
No one can enter a classroom now without being made aware of food warnings and restrictions. In California, a 2014 law requires that every school site must have an Epipen anti-allergy injector to treat potentially life-threatening reactions to food (anaphylaxis).[9]
An increasing number of studies suggest that epigenetic regulation of gene expression plays a critical role in the development of allergic diseases and that this regulation can be affected by diet.[10] Other studies support a link between gut microbiome dysbiosis and food allergy.[11]
2. Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes is a serious lifelong condition in which the blood glucose level is too high because the pancreas produces little or no insulin, a hormone that allows uptake of glucose by the body’s cells to produce energy from food eaten or to store the glucose for future use. The rate of this disease has been rising in recent decades, both in the US and in Europe. Unlike other diseases, Type 1 diabetes is easy to correctly diagnose and hard to miss. Left untreated, the disease is fatal.
In 2015, 193,000 children and adolescents younger than age 20 (0.24% of the total US population younger than age 20) were reported to have diabetes.[12] This number does not include pre-diabetes, a condition that is linked to obesity and is rising alarmingly in children. Nor does it include the vast number of children with Type 2 diabetes and/or metabolic syndrome. Type 2 diabetes is a serious condition in which the insulin made by the pancreas is either not used properly by the body (“insulin resistance”) or the pancreas cannot make enough insulin. Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions – including increased blood pressure, high blood sugar, excess body fat around the waist, and abnormal blood cholesterol or triglyceride levels — that occur together, increasing the risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.
The rise in childhood diabetes began in the mid-20th century. The best US data available to examine trends comes from the Erie County study set up in 1962. The study reports an incidence of 11.3 per 100,000 people per year in 1959–1961. But by the end of the 20th century, some 3–4 children out of 1,000 in Western industrialized countries would require insulin treatment, and a steady rise in incidence had been reported from many other parts of the world.[13]
Between 2002 and 2012, the rate of newly diagnosed cases of type 1 diabetes in youth in the US increased by about 1.8 percent each year. During the same time period, the rate of new diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes increased even more quickly, at 4.8 percent each year.[14],[15]
Epigenetic changes leading to alterations in gene function are involved in the inflammatory aspects of type 2 diabetes, and inflammation plays an important role in all aspects of this illness. Therefore researchers are looking at ways of modifying the epigenetic status in order to cure or prevent the disease.[16]
Allergenic foods and gut microbiome dysbiosis are suspected triggers for type 1 diabetes. Gut dysbiosis seems to increase intestinal permeability (causing “leaky gut” syndrome), which in turn leads to inflammation and autoimmunity. Encouraging a healthier gut microbiome appears to be a promising preventative method and therapy for this disease.[17] Gut microbiome dysbiosis has been found to be a cause of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.[18]
3. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
Autoimmune bowel diseases have been increasing in children, most notably since 1990. Two of these diseases, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, are distinctly on the rise. This group of diseases is often life-altering for children and can lead to the development of other serious disorders, such as cancers, later in life. Canada has the highest reported rate of IBD. The Canadian data show that both the prevalence (commonness) and incidence (rate of newly diagnosed cases) of IBD have increased remarkably from 1994 to 2005, especially in younger children.[19] These trends are comparable to worldwide patterns.
There is growing evidence that epigenetic factors, such as DNA methylation, play a role in the development of IBD and that DNA methylation in the gut can react to changes in the microbiota.[20]
Current scientific opinion holds that genetically predisposed people develop gut microbiome dysbiosis and that inflammation develops as a result of environmental stressors. Genetic predisposition or dysbiosis in isolation do not lead to IBD. Instead, complex interactions between the environment, genetics, gut microbiota, and the immune system appear to be responsible.[21]
4. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral disorders
The rates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and neurodevelopmental disability have been increasing exponentially within the last two decades.[22] Previously this rise was attributed to improvements in our ability to detect these problems. However, this explanation has fallen by the wayside as the rates of such disabilities in children are skyrocketing. Exposure to certain pesticides during pregnancy is among known risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders, including lower IQ and impaired motor skills.[23]
A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) looked at the prevalence of ADHD in US children and teenagers over a 20-year period. During the period 1997–1998, the prevalence of ADHD was 6.1%. But this number increased to 10.2% by 2015–2016. All subgroups by age, sex, ethnicity, family income, and geographic region showed a statistically significant increase in prevalence.[24]
The National Health Center for Health Statistics released a report on developmental disability in children, including autism. The report found that in the two years between 2014 and 2016 – an extremely short time frame – the prevalence of developmental disability in children aged 3–17 years increased from 5.76 to 6.99% (see graph below), or 1 in 14 children.[25]

In 2014, ASD affected 1 in 59 children and was four times as common in boys as in girls.[26] This qualifies as an epidemic. According to data from the US CDC, there are wide differences between states, with New Jersey having the highest rate. The CDC states that it is unknown to what extent environmental or genetic factors play a role.[27] However, the rapid rise in this condition means that even if genetic factors do play a role, there are also strong environmental triggers at work.
Epigenetics is believed to play a role in the development of ASD, though research is ongoing to identify which epigenetic changes are associated with the disorder and which environmental triggers may be at work.[28]
Many studies show that an abnormal gut microbiome is related to ASD and that treatments that alter the gut microbiome result in improvements in ASD symptoms.[29]
5. Celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity
Celiac disease (CD) is a genetically predisposed autoimmune disease that is being diagnosed with increased frequency in both children and adults.[30] ,[31] Another condition, non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), also known as non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS), is also on the rise. The causes and triggers of both diseases are poorly understood.[32]
The prevalence of CD in children in the Denver area has been estimated at up to 3% by the age of 15.[33]
Almost all patients diagnosed with CD have variations in at least two of the genes that play a role in enabling the organism to distinguish between self and non-self (known as the “major histocompatibility complex” genes). But while 40% of people have these gene variants, not everyone who has them goes on to develop CD.[32] This suggests that either variations in other genes or environmental factors, or both are the cause of this disease.
Thus the rise in prevalence of CD cannot be fully explained by genetic factors. Celiac researcher and gastroenterologist Edwin Liu, of the University of Colorado School of Medicine, explained, “Over decades, it’s just too quick for genetic changes to occur. We have to assume that this is based on environmental factors.”[32] It is not known which environmental factors are to blame.
Nor can the rise in prevalence be attributed to improvements in diagnosis. Joseph Murray, a celiac researcher at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, commented that data indicating rising rates in the US showed that “We weren’t just better at finding celiac disease”, but that “There was a lot more of it to go around.”[32]
This trend began before the introduction in 1996 of genetically engineered food and the associated increases in pesticide use, but has continued to rise since then.
A disturbance in epigenetic regulation of expression of certain genes has been found to be involved in CD.[34] Marked gut microbiome dysbiosis has also been found in the small intestine of adults with CD and this bacterial imbalance is suspected of contributing to the inflammation that characterizes the disease.[35]
6. Obesity
In the US, the percentage of children and teens with obesity has more than tripled since the 1970s.[36] Data from 2015–16 show that nearly 1 in 5 children aged 6-19 years old is obese.[37]
Obesity has serious knock-on effects on the physical, emotional and mental well-being of children. Obese children are at higher risk for other health conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, asthma, sleep apnea, and musculoskeletal conditions. They are apt to be bullied at school and suffer from mental health issues due to social marginalization and low self-esteem.[38] Obese children will likely go on to become obese adults, carrying with them the health risks mentioned above, as well as an increased risk of colorectal cancer for males.[39]
The obesity epidemic is not primarily due to genetics but to lifestyle and environmental factors. However, researchers believe it likely that obesity is associated with both genetic and environmental influences on epigenetic status.[40]
Recent studies suggest that obesity is associated with gut microbiome dysbiosis. Obese people have been found to have less intestinal bacterial diversity.[41]
Case studies
The US – in common with many other developed nations – is faced with sick children, unhealthy food, and a medical system unable to care for them.[42] Fortunately, lifestyle interventions can make a dramatic difference to children’s health. In my clinical experience, the most successful intervention is switching the whole family to a diet based on organically grown foods that are as little processed as possible and cooked fresh at home.
For example, 5-year-old Chase was a boy who was brought to me because of his food allergy symptoms, including recurrent abdominal pain, constipation and eczema. He was having trouble starting kindergarten because of his discomfort. Upon evaluation, Chase was found to have both IgE and IgG antibodies (which the body produces in response to foreign “threats”) to dairy and gluten. The family ate organic food inconsistently. Upon switching to organic food and slowly phasing out the food culprits (this transition was difficult for the family since they believed he would become calcium-deficient without milk), Chase’s health issues resolved within a month.
Many of my child patients have been diagnosed with ASD. This generally means frequent clinic visits since these children have many associated disorders such as gastrointestinal complaints, sleep disruptions, behavioral issues, and infections. A large proportion of children “on the spectrum” that I’ve cared for have had issues with gluten, dairy, and occasionally soy. These children may also be picky eaters, so removing the junk food from their diet can be challenging. Many parents lament that this is all they can get their child to eat. This was the case with Juan, a 6-year-old boy from the Central Valley of California. But his family persisted with changing his diet to organic and later eliminating allergenic foods. The switch resulted in a complete resolution of his gastrointestinal complaints – as well as improving his mood.
While such a dietary change is just a first step in the treatment, parents report their children having less intestinal complaints, improved sleep, and better behavior.
These case examples and many more exemplify the tenet of the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates,who said, “Let food be thy medicine”. We can update this for our current times to say, “Let organic food be thy epigenetic and gut microbiome medicine.” Such a diet lays the foundation of good health for children and adults alike.
References

  1. Bethell CD, Logan MD, Strickland BB, Schor EL, Robertson J, Newacheck PW. A national and state profile of leading health problems and health care quality for US children: key insurance disparities and across-state variations. Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-June; 11(3 Suppl):S22-23.
  2. Sagner M et al (2014). Lifestyle medicine potential for reversing a world of chronic disease epidemics: from cell to community. Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Nov;68(11):1289-92. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12509.
  3. Feinberg AP (2018). The key role of epigenetics in human disease prevention and mitigation. N Engl J Med 378:1323-1334.
  4. Kho ZY (2018). The human gut microbiome – a potential controller of wellness and disease. Front Microbiol. 9:1835. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01835.
  5. Qin Y (2018). Crosstalk between the microbiome and epigenome: messages from bugs. J Biochem. 163(2):105-112. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvx080.
  6. Gupta RS, Springston MR, Warrier BS, Rajesh K, Pongracic J, Holl JL (2011). The prevalence, severity, and distribution of childhood food allergy in the United States. Pediatrics 128(1):e9-17.
  7. Jackson KD, Howie LD, Akinbami LJ (2013). Trends in allergic conditions among children: United States, 1997-2011. NCHS Data Brief No 121. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db121.htm
  8. Lin RY, Anderson AS, Shah SN, Nurruzzaman F (2008). Increasing anaphylaxis hospitalizations in the first two decades of life: New York State, 1990-2006. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 101(4):387-93.
  9. California Legislature (2014). Senate Bill No. 1266, Chapter 321. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB1266
  10. Lee SE, Kim H (2016). Update on early nutrition and food allergy in children. Yonsei Med J. 57(3):542–548. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.542.
  11. Blázquez AB, Berin C (2017). Microbiome and food allergy. Translational Research 179: 199-203.
  12. American Diabetes Association (2018). Statistics about diabetes: Overall numbers, diabetes and prediabetes. http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/statistics/
  13. Gale EAM (2002). The rise of childhood type 1 diabetes in the 20th century. Diabetes 51(12): 3353-3361. http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/content/51/12/3353
  14. National Institutes of Health (2017). Rates of new diagnosed cases of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on the rise among children, teens. April 13. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/rates-new-diagnosed-cases-type-1-type-2-diabetes-rise-among-children-teens
  15. Mayer-Davis EJ et al (2017). Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002–2012. N Engl J Med 2017(376):1419-1429. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1610187
  16. Sommese L et al (2017). Clinical relevance of epigenetics in the onset and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Epigenetics 12(6): 401–415. doi:  10.1080/15592294.2016.1278097
  17. Bibbò S et al (2017). Is there a role for gut microbiota in type 1 diabetes pathogenesis? Ann Med. 49(1):11-22. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1222449.
  18. Li x et al (2017). Gut microbiota dysbiosis drives and implies novel therapeutic strategies for diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Front Immunol. 8:1882. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01882.
  19. Benchimol EI et al (2017). Trends in epidemiology of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: Distributed network analysis of multiple population-based provincial health administrative databases. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 112: 1120–1134. https://www.nature.com/articles/ajg201797
  20. Kellermayer R (2012). Epigenetics and the developmental origins of inflammatory bowel diseases. Can J Gastroenterol. 26(12): 909–915.
  21. Abegunde AT et al (2016). Environmental risk factors for inflammatory bowel diseases: Evidence based literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 22(27):6296–6317.
  22. Halfon N et al (2012). The changing landscape of disability in childhood. The Future of Children 22(1):13-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22550684
  23. Shelton JF et al (2014). Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: The CHARGE Study. Environmental Health Perspectives 122(10): 1103–1110. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.1307044
  24. Xu G et al (2018). Twenty-year trends in diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among US children and adolescents, 1997-2016. JAMA Network Open 1(4):e181471. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1471
  25. NCHS (2017). Estimated prevalence of children with diagnosed developmental disabilities in the United States, 2014–2016. NCHS Data Brief No 291. November. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db291.pdf
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018). Autism spectrum disorder (ASD): Data and statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Community report on autism. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/states/comm_report_autism_2014.pdf
  28. Siu MT, Weksberg R (2017). Epigenetics of autism spectrum disorder. In: Delgado-Morales R. (eds) Neuroepigenomics in Aging and Disease. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 978. Springer, Cham.
  29. Li Q et al (2017). The gut microbiota and autism spectrum disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 11:120. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00120.
  30. Ludvigsson JF et al (2013). Increasing incidence of celiac disease in a North American population. Am J Gastroenterol 108(5): 818–824. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686116/
  31. Liu E et al (2017). High incidence of celiac disease in a long-term study of adolescents with susceptibility genotypes. Gastroenterology 152(6):1329-1336.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.002
  32. Offord C (2017). The celiac surge. The Scientist, June 1. https://www.the-scientist.com/features/the-celiac-surge-31438
  33. Liu E et al (2017). High incidence of celiac disease in a long-term study of adolescents with susceptibility genotypes. Gastroenterology 152(6):1329-1336.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.002
  34. Oittinen M et al (2016). Polycomb repressive complex 2 enacts Wnt signaling in intestinal homeostasis and contributes to the instigation of stemness in diseases entailing epithelial hyperplasia or neoplasia. Stem Cells 35(2):445–457.
  35. D’Argenio V et al (2016). Metagenomics reveals dysbiosis and a potentially pathogenic N. flavescens strain in duodenum of adult celiac patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun; 111(6): 879–890. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.95.
  36. Fryar CD et al (2016). Prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents aged 2–19 years: United States, 1963–1965 through 2013–2014. NCHS Health E-Stats. July. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity_child_13_14/obesity_child_13_14.pdf
  37. Hales CM et al (2017). Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief No 288. October. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288.pdf
  38. Pulgarón ER (2013). Childhood obesity: A review of increased risk for physical and psychological co-morbidities. Clin Ther 35(1): A18–A32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3645868/
  39. Maffeis C, Tatò L (2001). Long-term effects of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality. Horm Res 55 Suppl 1:42-5
  40. Herrera BM et al (2011). Genetics and epigenetics of obesity. Maturitas. 69(1):41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.02.018.
  41. DeGruttola AK et al (2016). Current understanding of dysbiosis in disease in human and animal models. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 22(5):1137–1150. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000750.
  42. Perro M and Adams V (2017). What’s Making Our Children Sick? How Industrial Food Is Causing an Epidemic of Chronic Illness, and What Parents (and Doctors) Can Do About It. Chelsea Green. https://www.chelseagreen.com/product/whats-making-our-children-sick/

 

Action Items

Regulatory Oversight

 Enhanced Regulations:

  • The FDA and other regulatory bodies must establish stricter guidelines and permissible limits for toxic metals in infant formula. This action has been already put into our place since our meeting with the FDA prior to the release of our data reported in this blog by Moms Across America.

Regular Testing:

  • Mandatory, routine testing for heavy metals in all infant formula products should be enforced to ensure compliance with safety standards.

Transparent Reporting:

  • Companies should be required to disclose test results publicly, promoting transparency and accountability.

Proactive Measures by Companies

Sourcing and Production Controls:

  • Infant formula manufacturers must implement rigorous controls over their raw materials and production processes to minimize contamination.

Regular Audits:

  • Frequent internal and third-party audits should be conducted to ensure adherence to safety protocols and identify potential sources of contamination.

Research and Development:

  • Investment in research to develop technologies and methods for removing or reducing heavy metal content in infant formulas.

Remediation Solutions

Advanced Filtration Systems:

  • Implementing advanced filtration technologies during production to remove toxic metals.

Ingredient Substitution:

  • Identifying and using alternative, less contaminated sources of raw materials.

Chelating Agents:

  • Exploring the use of safe chelating agents that can bind to metals, making them less bioavailable and reducing their toxic effects.

What the Data Means to Moms

For mothers and caregivers, these findings can be alarming. However, it is essential to understand the implications and take informed steps to ensure the safety of their infants. Breastfeeding remains the best option for infant nutrition, when possible, as it naturally minimizes exposure to contaminants.

Recommendations Based on Data

Prioritize Breastfeeding:

  • Whenever possible, opt for breastfeeding to provide the safest and most natural nutrition for your baby.

Choose Carefully:

  • When breastfeeding is not an option, select infant formulas that have been independently tested and verified for low levels of toxic metals.
  • Maximize moms’ diet utilizing organic regenerative whole foods, including an array of fermented foods, filtered water, and nutritional supplements, such as prenatal vitamins and probiotics.

Stay Informed:

  • Keep abreast of the latest research and reports on infant formula safety to make informed decisions.

Advocate for Change:

  • Support initiatives and petitions calling for stricter regulations and safer infant formula products. (See the end of this article for a petition/call-to-action.)

Sample Considerations

The recommendations based on our findings proved challenging since all formulas tested positive for aluminum and lead. Other difficult considerations were based on the fact that not all metals are equally toxic and it is unclear whether having more metals at lower amounts was more toxic than fewer metals with higher amounts. The literature did not prove helpful in this regard.

Hence, the best attempts were made to offer advice for concerned parents based on this one study of toxic metals without other concomitant toxicants studied. A scorecard was designed, rating the formulas from 1 – 3, with 1 being the best based on 5 toxic metals studied and without consideration of other factors. The formulas were chosen for lowest levels of lead, mercury and cadmium. Lower levels of aluminum were considered since they all tested positive. There were no ideal formulations, and the recommendations were based on the 20 tested. There were differences in the two samples of the same formula which may not be statistically significant.

Overall formula recommendations:1

  1. Similac Sensitive infant formula
  2. Kirkland ProCare Non-GMO infant formula – NOTE: My top choice factoring in other contaminants/pesticides
  3. PurAmino hypoallergenic powder infant formula (For babies with digestive issues requiring predigested formulas)

Formula recommendations:2

  1. Gerber Good Start Gentle Pro
  2. Earth’s Best Organic Sensitivity Formula

Formula recommendations:3

  1. Enfamil Sensitive Infant Formula
  2. Similac Total Comfort Infant Formula
  3. Up & Up Gentle Premium Powder Infant Formula
  4. Up & Up Non-GMO Hypoallergenic Powder Infant Formula
  5. Enfamil Plant-Based Soy Powder Infant Formula

Strategic Recommendations

Targeted Research

Understand Contamination Sources:

  • Conduct further research to understand the sources of metal contamination in infant formulas, including soil contamination with pesticides, water used in manufacturing, and packaging materials.

Long-Term Health Impacts:

  • Investigate the long-term health impacts of chronic exposure to low levels of these metals in infants.

Consumer Guidance

Interpreting Lab Results:

  • Educate parents on how to interpret lab results and select formulas with the lowest possible contamination levels.

Support Safe Feeding Practices:

  • Provide resources and support for parents to transition to safer feeding practices, whether through breastfeeding support or safer formula alternatives.

Enhanced Testing Protocols

Rigorous Testing:

  • Mandate formula manufacturers to adopt more rigorous testing protocols, including testing for a broader range of contaminants and more frequent testing intervals.

Standardized Procedures:

  • Advocate for standardized testing procedures across the industry to ensure consistency and reliability in reported results.

Supply Chain Transparency

Transparency:

  • Push for greater transparency in the supply chain of infant formula ingredients.
  • This includes sourcing, production processes, and quality control measures.

Traceability:

  • Implement traceability measures to identify and mitigate contamination sources promptly.

Policy and Advocacy

Environmental Contamination:

  • Support policy initiatives aimed at reducing environmental contamination, as many of these metals enter the food chain through polluted air, water, and soil.

International Cooperation:

  • Advocate for international cooperation to address the global nature of food safety, as ingredients are often sourced from multiple countries.

Summary

The presence of toxic metals in infant formula is a critical issue that demands immediate action.

Public education is crucial to raise awareness among parents and caregivers about the potential risks and safety measures. Regulatory action by Congress is necessary to empower the FDA and other agencies to enforce stringent safety standards. Additionally, formula companies must take corrective actions to ensure their products are safe.

To address this issue, we are initiating a petition to urge Congress to remove any barriers preventing the FDA from enforcing these necessary regulations. In the meantime, parents can consider various supplements that may help offset the toxicity, although this should be done in consultation with healthcare professionals.

By working together—regulators, companies, and consumers—we can ensure that infant formula products are safe and healthy for our most vulnerable population, our babies.

Our Petition:

Please cut and paste this letter, add 1-3 sentences at the top to personalize it and increase the chances of it being read, and send it directly to your Senator and Representative today!

Find your Senator and Representatives’ emails and telephone numbers here.

Dear Senator_____ or Representative _______,

I am writing to ask for your support in making baby food and formula safer for our babies. Will you support the Baby Food Safety Act of 2024 and insist that baby formula is included? Please authorize the FDA with the ability to do their job and protect human health. Baby formula is often the ONLY food a baby consumes for the first six months of their lives and must be monitored for heavy metals. Our babies ARE our future and they are the most vulnerable. If swift action is not taken, babies from both sides of the aisle will continue to be severely impacted and their mental, physical, and reproductive health issues will affect the future of America.

GMOScience and The New MDS, Moms Across America, a national educational nonprofit dedicated to empowering mothers and others to create healthy families and communities, today announces the results of testing for five toxic metals in 20 infant formula products. Samples included organic as well as non-organic and plant-based as well as animal product formulas sold by four of the major producers of infant formula in the United States and across the globe. Two samples of each product were tested, for a total of 40 samples.

Concerning findings include:

  • 100% of the 40 samples tested contained aluminum and lead.
  • 57% of the samples tested positive for arsenic, 55% for mercury, and 35% for cadmium.
  • Six of the 20 formulas were positive for all five toxic metals in both samples.
  • At 41,000 ppb, aluminum levels in a goat’s milk baby formula were 4000 – 40,000x higher than other metals in the formulas tested and exceed limits set by the FDA for maximum safety level of aluminum for a preemie.
  • Levels of mercury in four samples measured above the limit allowed by the FDA in drinking water.
  • Levels of cadmium in both samples of one formula were nearly twice the level allowed in drinking water.

The FDA concluded many years ago that babies and young children are particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of food contaminants because of their small bodies and rapid cellular growth. In 1962, the FDA launched the Total Diet Study, recently published in July, 2002, analyzing 910 foods, including only four infant formulas. Two of the four formulas contained toxic metals, including uranium. In April 2021, the FDA announced its “Closer to Zero” plan, wherein it committed to proposing allowable levels of lead in various baby foods by April 2022, levels of inorganic arsenic by April 2024, and cadmium and mercury sometime after 2024. None of those deadlines, however, have been met, and all of them have been removed from the Closer to Zero website.

To date, the only actionable limits the agency has set are for one toxic metal only (inorganic arsenic) in one type of baby food product (infant rice cereal).

Citing findings of nearly 400 childhood lead poisoning cases in fall 2023 linked to recalled cinnamon applesauce pouches. A coalition of 20 Attorneys General led by New York’s Attorney General Letitia James issued a letter to the FDA on February 15 of this year to call on the federal agency to protect babies and young children in the United States from lead and other toxic metals in baby food. That letter followed an October 2021 petition and subsequent June 2022 petition, asking the FDA to issue specific guidance to the baby food industry to require testing of all finished food products for lead and other toxic metals.

It has been over two years! Action must be taken now!

Moms Across America, GlyphosateFacts, and GMOScience presented the new baby formula test results and science from Stephanie Seneff and others in meetings with congressional representatives and the FDA in Washington, DC from April 29 to May 2. They were informed by Jim Jones, Deputy Commissioner for Human Foods at the FDA, that the agency is waiting for Congress to pass legislation that would mandate testing for lead and other harmful chemicals in food. On May 9, US lawmakers introduced the Baby Food Safety Act of 2024, which, with Congressional approval, would allow the FDA to regulate and enforce limits on levels of heavy metals found in baby food and potentially formula.

Please support the Baby Food Safety Act of 2024 and insist that baby formula is added to the bill so that the FDA may regulate and monitor levels of heavy metals in both baby food and baby formula.

Thank you.

Signed with Gratitude,

Your constituent __________________

References:

  1. https://www.fda.gov/food/resources-you-food/infant-formula#oversee
  2. https://www.fda.gov/food/resources-you-food/infant-formula
  3. https://www.fda.gov/food/buy-store-serve-safe-food/handling-infant-formula-safely-what-you-need-know
  4. https://www.fda.gov/food/consumers/agricultural-biotechnology
  5. https://www.fda.gov/food/people-risk-foodborne-illness/food-safety-infants-toddlers
  6. https://www.fda.gov/food/infant-formula-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/enforcement-discretion-manufacturers-increase-infant-formula-supplies#regular
  7. https://www.fda.gov/media/71695/download?attachment
  8. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=53106
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Kennedy-40/publication/333582853_Environmental_toxicants_and_infant_mortality_in_America_Peertechz_Journal_of_Biological_Research_and_Development_11_36-61/links/5d111f6592851cf440492ee1/Environmental-toxicants-and-infant-mortality-in-America-Peertechz-Journal-of-Biological-Research-and-Development-11-36-61.pdf
  10. unsafe at any level
  11. https://reneedufault.com/
  12. https://gmoscience.org/
  13. https://www.momsacrossamerica.com/
  14. https://www.ewg.org/research/ewgs-guide-infant-formula-and-baby-bottles
  15. https://www.inonaround.org/baby-formula/
  16. https://projecttendr.thearc.org/
  17. https://hbbf.org/
  18. https://www.hbbf.org/solutions/healthy-baby-foods
  19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415012/: Developmental pesticide exposure reproduces features of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871549/:Prenatal Mercury Exposure and Neurodevelopment up to the Age of 5 Years: A Systematic Review
  21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461492/:Fetal and postnatal metal dysregulation in autism
  22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764574/:Lead and mercury exposures: interpretation and action

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Chemical_Use/WheatPostharvestChemicalUseFactSheet.pdf

Related Posts