By Michelle Perro, M.D., D. Hom.
Caring for children has been my entire life’s work. It requires an open mind to perform this work, particularly in our present environment that challenges the health of this very vulnerable population. For those of us who embrace the role of being children’s health care providers, our own vigilance to their well-being must be finely tuned and forever adapting.
I never had visions of being an activist, an environmentalist, or an academic pediatrician. I am a clinician and educator. Approximately 15 years ago, I began to witness a significant change in the status of children’s health. The changes were global, meaning they involved all aspects of their growth and development. The common denominator to many of their health complaints revolved around gastrointestinal dysfunction, which often manifested as neurocognitive disorders. It is there that my journey and career fork-in-the road began.
Life does not happen in singular events. This is also true for the factors that influence our health. In a traumatic event, there is an action that causes a subsequent problem. Not much discussion there. But in our present climate, children are now faced with several exposures that have only been present in the past 20 years, and many are increasing. For the most part, the health ramifications are unknown and have not been rigorously studied. It is very difficult to tease out the multiple, interactive, and changing root causes of their health issues.
The science regarding multiple toxic exposures on our children’s health is inadequate[1]. When pondering the rapid decline of our children’s health in this short window of time, there are few studies that have examined the effects of combined impacts such as pesticides in their food, water and air, GMOs, multiple industrial chemicals, air pollution, etc. How does one tease out what is the problem causing the symptom? Which children are affected most by which factor? How much of an exposure is required to produce a health effect? What is the role of genetics and epigenetics in their declining health? Why is one sibling affected and others not, even in twin births? I found myself surrounded by questions inadequately being addressed in the literature.
Caring for an ill child comes at a high price to families. Many parents are both working and scrambling for everything from childcare to meals. It is not difficult to see that a tremendous amount of stress is added on to the task of raising a family when there are health challenges. Parents are stressed and stretched, and their health can suffer, creating a negative spiral that can erode the health of entire families.
So, how do you clinically approach chronically ill children, many having been told by their present health care providers and medical system that there is no diagnosis, let alone cure for what they have? An astute clinician will scan for health trends. An experienced clinician will extrapolate data from the present science and make adaptations. A broad-minded clinician will think outside the box and expand their treatment repertoire.
Because the health problems faced by children are so ubiquitous, I have focused recently on factors that affect all children regardless of gender, income, race and other characteristics. I keep coming back to food and water as part of the problem. I focused on food because children have a high intake per pound of bodyweight, to support their growth and metabolism. Has there been a change to our food supply that could explain my clinical observations? As I began to dissect the literature about our food, I was shocked to learn that GMOs were not studied in humans, that certain pesticides were being applied in ever-increasing amounts with known health consequences,[2] and that much of the academic/research community was heavily supported by industry.
I began making nutritional changes in my patients. Focusing on their intestinal health and microbiome, I brought in a multi-prong approach encompassing lifestyle changes, homeopathics, supplements, herbs and osteopathic treatments. And they got better. Significantly better. The treatments were individualized based on the patients’ histories, clinical exams, and extensive laboratory testing. I attribute these successes to the relationship between clean food and health, as well as utilizing my own clinical experience with treating children and my expanded medical toolbox.
Which issues improved? Autism, autoimmune disease, chronic abdominal pain and constipation, ADHD, sleeping issues, immune dysfunction, and the list goes on. Not only did kids get better, but also many chronic diseases completely resolved.
The take-away message is clear. There seems to be a profound problem with what children are eating and our present food supply. There is a rapidly expanding toll on our kids’ health and all of our health. The health issues are both hard to diagnose and treat within the present medical model, so many parents will grow desperate and frustrated as they try to help their children.
Let’s try an experiment: allow children to have access to food without added flavors, colors, emulsifiers and preservatives, food that is not genetically altered, and with as few toxic chemicals as our polluted world will allow. Monitor their health, observe and report our findings. Is that too much to ask?
References
- Silins, Ilona, and Johan Högberg. “Combined Toxic Exposures and Human Health: Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8.3 (2011): 629–647. ↑
- Liu, Jianghong, and Erin Schelar. “Pesticide Exposure and Child Neurodevelopment: Summary and Implications.” Workplace health & safety60.5 (2012): 235–243. ↑
Related Posts
Pediatric Environmental Health Questionnaire
Pediatric Environmental Health Questionnaire (PEHQ)
August 2024
Michelle Perro, MD
CEO, GMOScience.org
Assessing the Top Ten Toxic Exposures in Children
The Pediatric Environmental Health Questionnaire (PEHQ) is a tool for practitioners and parents to aid in assessing children at risk of harm due to environmental toxicants. It is not meant to be all-inclusive, but a screening aid to identify at-risk children and create awareness regarding a prominent and overlooked contributor to chronic health issues.
The questions evaluate the ten most likely sources of childhood environmental toxicants and should be included as part of a complete intake in all children in clinical settings, as well as by parents at home.
It is of primary importance to reduce exposure and the toxic load. Children have increased susceptibility and toxicity from exposures far greater than adults due to their size, childhood behaviors (i.e., exploring their world hand-to-mouth), and lowered detoxification abilities as compared to adults.
Get the Lead Out
Time to Rock and Roll: Get the Lead Out!
June 2024
Michelle Perro, MD
CEO, GMOScience.org
We are at the fork in the road — do we really want to protect our children or are we at an attitude of platitude?
The Infant Formula Toxic Metal Study Getting Press
Moms Across America, The New MDS, and GMOScience, banded together and did the work of regulatory agencies. We’ve confirmed what officials already knew; infant formula, the only food for many babies, is contaminated and it has been given a pass.
However, this David and Goliath tale has not gone unnoticed and has been picked up by global news agencies, including Dr. Mercola, The Exposé, Children’s Health Defense, and The Townsend Letter. Additionally, the FDA has made recommendations to Congress regarding the Safe Baby Food Act based on our joint meeting regarding our findings in May 2024.
Millions of parents are now becoming aware of the toxic metal contamination in the formulas that they are feeding their most vulnerable and immediate action must occur to rectify this situation.
The Alliance of Censorship and Propaganda
The Alliance of Censorship and Propaganda
June 2024
Michelle Perro, MD
CEO, GMOScience.org
Censorship and propaganda are intrinsically linked as tools of information control used to shape public perception and influence societal attitudes. Censorship involves the suppression or restriction of access to information, often to prevent dissenting or opposing viewpoints from reaching the public. This creates a controlled information environment where only select narratives are allowed to prevail. Propaganda, on the other hand, actively disseminates specific information, often biased or misleading, to promote a particular political agenda or ideology.